999 v. C.I.T. CORP.

Nos. 84-6561, 85-6562.

776 F.2d 866 (1985)

999, a corporation, Plaintiff/Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. C.I.T. CORPORATION, a corporation, Defendant/Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided November 18, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Earl Benjamin, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff, appellee, cross-appellant.

William A. Masterson, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, Los Angeles, Cal., William Hughes Mulligan, New York City, for defendant, appellant, cross-appellee.

Before REINHARDT and BEEZER, Circuit Judges, and NIELSEN, District Judge.


BEEZER, Circuit Judge:

999, a Nevada corporation with its principal place of business in California, brought this diversity of citizenship suit against C.I.T. Corporation ("CIT"), alleging breach of an agreement to provide financing to 999, resulting in the loss of an opportunity to acquire Bee Cee, a Missouri corporation. CIT appeals from a verdict in favor of 999, and 999 filed a cross-appeal to challenge a remittitur of damages. We affirm.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases