STILL v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL

No. 84-2509.

780 F.2d 848 (1985)

Minor Michael STILL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL, United States Parole Commission and Denver Sheriff's Department, Respondents-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

December 23, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen M. Munsinger, Keene & Munsinger, Denver, Colo., for petitioner-appellant.

Robert N. Miller, U.S. Atty., and Douglas W. Curless, Asst. U.S. Atty., Denver, Colo., for respondents-appellees.

Before McKAY, LOGAN and SEYMOUR, Circuit Judges.


McKAY, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a), Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore submitted without oral argument.

The issue presented by this appeal is whether the United States Parole Commission has the statutory authority to withdraw a parole violator...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases