STATE EX REL. UBIENSKI v. SHOEMAKER

No. 84-1304.

17 Ohio St. 3d 145 (1985)

THE STATE, EX REL. UBIENSKI, APPELLANT, v. SHOEMAKER, CHIEF, ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 29, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph J. LoPresti and Paul Mancino, Jr., for appellant.

Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., attorney general, and Joseph Mancini, for appellees.


Per Curiam.

The sole issue before this court is whether appellant is entitled to a writ of mandamus compelling appellee to rescind their decision changing his parole eligibility date. Entitlement to a writ of mandamus requires that appellant show that he has a clear legal right to the relief prayed for, that appellee is under a clear legal duty to perform the act, and that he has no adequate legal remedy. Appellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases