DOE v. HENNEPIN COUNTY

Civ. No. 4-84-115.

623 F.Supp. 982 (1985)

Steven DOE and Margaret Doe, individually and as the natural guardians of Jane Doe and Jean Doe, minor children, Plaintiffs, v. HENNEPIN COUNTY; Hennepin County Community Services Department Social Services Division — Child Protection; Hennepin County Community Services Department Social Services Division — Child Protection — Acute Unit; Raymond Ahrens, Division Director, individually and in his official capacity; Milton Henry, Supervisor, individually and in his official capacity; Gail Guthrie, Child Protection Worker, individually and in her official capacity; Carolyn McHenry, Child Protection Worker, individually and in her official capacity; Judith DuPre, Legal Section Worker, in her official capacity; the City of Mound, Minnesota; Bruce Wold, Chief of the Mound Police, individually and in his official capacity; William Hudson, Sergeant of the Mound Police, individually and in his official capacity; and Mindy Mitnick, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Fourth Division.

As Amended December 12, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Corey L. Gordon, Minneapolis, for plaintiffs.

Paul Donlin, and Alan Bradberg, Donlin & McBride, St. Paul, for defendant Mindy Mitnick.

Rolf E. Gilbertson, Maun, Green, Hayes, Simon, Johanneson & Brehl, St. Paul, for Mound defendants, but did not participate in the proceedings.

Marilyn J. Maloney, Asst. Co. Atty., Minneapolis, for Hennepin Co. defendants, but did not participate in the proceedings.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DIANA E. MURPHY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Steven and Margaret Doe, individually and as the natural guardians of Jane and Jean Doe, minor children,1 brought this action for damages and injunctive relief against Hennepin County, several county agencies, officials and employees, Mound Police officials, Adrian Yackley, and Mindy Mitnick. Plaintiffs allege violation of their civil rights and base their...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases