1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 612 F.Supp.
  5. 612 F.Supp. 967 (1985)
 

COURTNEY v. REMLER

Civ. A. No. 2:83-2347-1.

612 F.Supp. 967 (1985)

Ronald Hendrix COURTNEY, Plaintiff, v. Albert N. REMLER, Devaul L. Henderson, Jr., Dwain E. Ball, Erling D. Speer, Bernie Hirsch, Bernie Slotin, Robert M. Crumley, James E. Wright, E.K. Van Winkle, Jr., d/b/a Hotel Investments, A Limited Partnership, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division.

June 29, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joel D. Bailey, Beaufort, S.C., for plaintiff.

J. Rutledge Young, Jr., Charleston, S.C., for defendants.

HAWKINS, District Judge.

The defendants move for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Summary judgment is appropriate when "there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and ... the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law." Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). The burden is on the moving party to show the absence of any genuine issue of fact. Adickes v. H. Kress and Co., 398 U.S. 144

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases