McDONALD v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON

No. 85-5117.

776 F.2d 767 (1985)

Stanley McDONALD, Norman R. Hagfors and Clayton Jensen, Appellees, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided November 6, 1985.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied December 23, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Quaintance, Jr., Minneapolis, Minn., for appellant.

Daniel R. Shulman, Minneapolis, Minn., and Joseph Alioto, San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.

Before LAY, Chief Judge, HEANEY and FAGG, Circuit Judges.


Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied December 23, 1985.

LAY, Chief Judge.

Johnson & Johnson brings this interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1292(b) (West Supp.1985), challenging the district court's ruling that the payment and satisfaction of a judgment in a breach of contract action does not bar an action for fraud in the inducement of the contract arising under the same operative facts. In an earlier opinion, McDonald v. Johnson &...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases