CRAWFORD v. EUCLID NATL. BANK

No. 84-1526.

19 Ohio St. 3d 135 (1985)

CRAWFORD ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. EUCLID NATIONAL BANK, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided October 2, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kraig, DeWolfe & Pasz and Kerry B. DeWolfe, for appellants.

Hertz, Kates, Friedman & Kammer and Karl D. Kammer, for appellee.


Per Curiam.

In the first paragraph of the syllabus in Bruck, supra, this court stated that "[a]s a general rule no suit will lie for the malicious prosecution of a civil action, where there has been no arrest of the person or seizure of property."

The plaintiffs-appellants submit that one who has been required to deposit funds in an escrow account and accept a less favorable mortgage rate has sustained a sufficient seizure of property to establish...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases