ARGUS, INC. v. EASTMAN KODAK CO.

No. 79 Civ. 4525 (MP).

612 F.Supp. 904 (1985)

ARGUS, INCORPORATED and Interphoto Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

June 27, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

O'Connor & Hannan by Myles J. Ambrose, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff Argus Inc.

Marchi Jaffe Cohen Crystal Rosner & Katz by Ernest Allen Cohen, David R. Taxin, David Jaffe, New York City, for plaintiff Interphoto Corp.

Sullivan & Cromwell by Robert MacCrate, John L. Warden, William L. Farris, Marcy Engel, New York City, for defendant Eastman Kodak Co.


DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MILTON POLLACK, Senior District Judge.

This is an antitrust suit for violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act, claiming damages pursuant to § 4 of the Clayton Act for alleged injuries to the business or properties of the plaintiffs, Argus Incorporated and Interphoto Corporation.

The defendant, Eastman Kodak Company, has moved for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint. Kodak contends that: 1...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases