IN RE ORZEL

No. 83-479.

491 A.2d 1013 (1985)

In re Andrew L. and Helen K. ORZEL.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

Reargument Denied March 4, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lorentz and Lorentz, Rutland, for petitioners-appellants.

John J. Easton, Jr., Atty. Gen., and Merideth Wright, Asst. Atty. Gen., Montpelier, for amicus curiae Environmental Bd.

Before HILL, UNDERWOOD, PECK and GIBSON, JJ., and LARROW, J. (Ret.), Specially Assigned.


HILL, Justice.

The petitioners, Andrew and Helen Orzel, appeal the decision in two declaratory rulings issued by the State of Vermont Environmental Board (Board). Based on the findings of the Board in its rulings, we affirm its decision.

In 1973, petitioners purchased a ten-acre piece of property in the Town of Rutland. This property, which adjoins other property owned by the petitioners, is commonly known as "the gravel pit." The gravel pit had been used...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases