1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 756 F.2d
  5. 756 F.2d 699 (1985)
 

CLOROX CO. v. U.S. DIST. COURT FOR N.D. CAL.

No. 83-7815.

756 F.2d 699 (1985)

The CLOROX COMPANY, Petitioner, v. The UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted October 29, 1984.

Decided March 26, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Fries, Steinhart & Falconer, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.

Stephen L. Roycraft, Barfield, Barfield, Dryden & Ruane, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent.

Before SKOPIL and NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and EAST, District Judge.

SKOPIL, Circuit Judge:

Clorox Company ("Clorox") petitions for a writ of mandamus requiring the district court to vacate its order remanding this action to the state court from which it was removed. We conclude that the petition must be denied.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW

Carol Stower, a participant in Clorox's employee welfare benefit plan, filed the underlying action against Clorox in Alameda County (California) Superior Court. Stower's complaint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases