PARMER v. PLAID PANTRY NO. 54

82-05555; CA A33092.

709 P.2d 743 (1985)

76 Or.App. 405

In the matter of the Compensation of Erma L. PARMER, Claimant. Erma L. Parmer, Petitioner, v. PLAID PANTRY # 54, Employer and Wausau Insurance Company, Carrier, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 20, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert K. Udziela, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on brief was Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O'Leary & Conboy, Portland.

David Horne, Beaverton, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and WARDEN and NEWMAN, JJ.


RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Claimant seeks review of an order on reconsideration1 of the Workers' Compensation Board affirming the referee's decision that the insurer is not responsible under ORS 656.245(1)2 for paying for claimant's surgery. The issue is whether the Board should have remanded the case to the referee for taking further evidence under ORS 656.295(5).3 We reverse...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases