HASKINS v. FIRST CITY NAT. BANK OF LUFKIN

No. 09-85-094 CV.

698 S.W.2d 754 (1985)

Eula Lee HASKINS, Appellant, v. FIRST CITY NATIONAL BANK OF LUFKIN, Texas, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont.

October 17, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles K. Ruth, Nacogdoches, for appellant.

Julie A. Owens, Lufkin, for appellee.


OPINION

BROOKSHIRE, Justice.

Appeal from the granting of a motion for summary judgment filed by the bank. The bank's motion challenged the wording in a 1976 deed from Appellant and her spouse to her son, Joe Wade Haskins, asserting that the language constituted an unreasonable restraint on alienation and was void as a matter of law. The bank argued that it was a direct restraint. There is only one appellant and one appellee in this appeal. The appeal was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases