1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 781 F.2d
  5. 781 F.2d 670 (1985)
 

ROY v. VOLKSWAGENWERK AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

No. 85-5587.

781 F.2d 670 (1985)

Doug ROY, Jr., Individually, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. VOLKSWAGENWERK AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, a German corporation, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Designated for Publication November 29, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David M. Harney, James J. Pagliuso, Los Angeles, Cal., Barry R. Levy, Andrew Chang, Horvitz & Levy, Encino, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Robert E. King, Bakersfield, Cal., Herzfeld & Rubin, Richard L. Ackerman, Michael A. Zuk, Joseph D. Tuchmayer, Seymour W. Croft, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Before WRIGHT, HUG and HALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellees made a timely motion for new trial within ten days after the judgment under Rule 59(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The ground specified was the insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. Petitioners argue that that basis for the motion was not advanced with sufficient particularity. A later document, filed after the ten-day period, furnished the detailed arguments. The initial motion was adequate to preserve the jurisdiction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases