AKIN, Justice.
Appellant was convicted by a jury of the offense of burglary of a habitation. Punishment was assessed at 25 years confinement. We affirm.
In his sole ground of error, appellant contends that the court erred in allowing the prosecution, at the punishment phase, to argue facts outside the record. Specifically, he objects to the following argument:
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.