UNITED STATES v. SHAMI

No. 84-1545.

754 F.2d 670 (1985)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mohamed Arref SHAMI and Waleed Samaha, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided February 12, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sharon-Lee Edwards, Detroit, Mich., for defendants-appellants.

Leonard R. Gilman, U.S. Atty., Robert Donaldson, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Detroit, Mich., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before LIVELY, Chief Judge, and MARTIN and JONES, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

This case presents the question of whether the district court erred in failing to give a de novo review to those issues to which defendants filed objections. We hold that a de novo review is required by both Article III of the United States Constitution and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1982). We REVERSE and REMAND.

Mohamed Arref Shami and Waleed Samaha were each indicted with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute heroin. Samaha...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases