1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 173 Cal.App.3d
  5. 173 Cal.App.3d 1251 (1985)
 

PEOPLE v. MATHIS

Docket No. D001863.

173 Cal.App.3d 1251 (1985)

219 Cal. Rptr. 693

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JAMES MATHIS et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

November 5, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Douglas W. Grinnell and David B. Florance, under appointments by the Court of Appeal, for Defendants and Appellants.

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Keith I. Motley and Robert B. Shaw, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

WIENER, J.

James Mathis (Mathis) and Neoka Tate (Tate) appeal their respective judgments of conviction, Mathis for pandering (Pen. Code, § 266i)1 and pimping (§ 266h) and Tate for pandering and aiding and abetting an act of prostitution (§ 647, subd. (b)), on grounds of instructional and evidentiary error. They also appeal their respective sentences. We reverse their pandering convictions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases