1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 172 Cal.App.3d
  5. 172 Cal.App.3d 1243 (1985)
 

CURTIS v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Docket No. B008072.

172 Cal.App.3d 1243 (1985)

218 Cal. Rptr. 772

RONALD DAVID CURTIS, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

October 8, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

De Witt W. Clinton, County Counsel, and Rafael A. Ongkeko, Senior Deputy County Counsel, for Defendant and Appellant.

John Stanford Todd, City Attorney (Lakewood), and Todd & Siegel as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Appellant.

Hugh R. Manes, Carol A. Watson and Manes & Watson for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

ARABIAN, J. —

INTRODUCTION

Defendant and appellant the County of Los Angeles (County) was granted a summary judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c) against plaintiff and respondent Ronald David Curtis (plaintiff) on the ground that plaintiff's complaint under the California Tort Claims Act (Gov. Code, § 810 et seq.) presented no triable issue of fact and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases