1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 652 F.Supp.
  5. 652 F.Supp. 762 (1985)
 

ADAMS v. SWANSON

Civ. No. 85-868.

652 F.Supp. 762 (1985)

William D. ADAMS, Rita E. Adams, and William E. Adams, Plaintiffs, v. Robert SWANSON, Richard Davidson, and Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co., Incorporated, a Delaware corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Oregon.

November 22, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allen G. Drescher, Drescher & Arnold, Ashland, Or., for plaintiffs.

W.V. Deatherage, Steven H. Pratt, Medford, Or., Edward Turan, Marty Berglas, New York City, for defendants Davidson, and Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co., Inc.

OPINION

REDDEN, Judge:

Judge Juba's Findings and Recommendation is before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases