1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ill.
  4. 132 Ill.
  5. 132 Ill. App.3d 9 (1985)
 

DRYVIT SYSTEM, INC. v. RUSHING

No. 84-2147.

132 Ill. App.3d 9 (1985)

477 N.E.2d 35

DRYVIT SYSTEM, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHESTER RANDAL RUSHING, Defendant-Appellee.

Appellate Court of Illinois — First District (4th Division).

Opinion filed March 28, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Schaffenegger, Watson & Peterson, Ltd., of Chicago (Donald G. Peterson and Karla Wright, of counsel), for appellant.

Chapman & Cutler, of Chicago (Michael W. Ford, John B. Huck, Richard A. Wohlleber, and David S. Barritt, of counsel), for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

PRESIDING JUSTICE JIGANTI delivered the opinion of the court:

Chester Randal Rushing, the defendant, was regional sales manager of Dryvit System, Inc., the plaintiff. In consideration for continued employment he signed an agreement not to compete with Dryvit nor disclose confidential information at the conclusion of his employment. Dryvit brought this action, contending that after leaving...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases