1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 708 P.2d
  5. 708 P.2d 649 (1985)
 

STATE v. BRISTOW

83-1989; CA A35062.

708 P.2d 649 (1985)

76 Or.App. 388

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Robert DeLane BRISTOW, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 14, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Helen I. Bloch, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.

Terry Leggert, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and WARDEN and NEWMAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction for driving while suspended. He contends that because the suspension was based on a conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants, which was subsequently determined to be void, State v. Bristow, 71 Or.App. 219, 691 P.2d 161 (1984), the suspension order is invalid. The state concedes that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases