Per Curiam.
Respondent was admitted to practice by the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, Third Judicial Department, on October 27, 1952. In this proceeding to discipline him for professional misconduct, petitioner moves to confirm the report of the Special Referee and respondent submits a memorandum in opposition to said motion.
The Special Referee sustained four charges of professional misconduct against respondent. The first charge alleged that respondent...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.