1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 623 F.Supp.
  5. 623 F.Supp. 719 (1985)
 

HAMMERMAN v. PEACOCK

Civ. A. No. 84-2724.

623 F.Supp. 719 (1985)

Robert HAMMERMAN, Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, v. Thomas A. PEACOCK, Defendant and Counterclaimant, v. SMITH BARNEY, HARRIS UPHAM & COMPANY, INC., Additional Defendant on Counterclaim.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

September 20, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morris Kletzkin, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff and counter-defendant.

Robert L. Cope, Washington, D.C., for defendant and counterclaimant.

James H. Schropp, Washington, D.C., for additional defendant on counterclaim.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

NORMA HOLLOWAY JOHNSON, District Judge.

By Memorandum Opinion and Order entered herein on July 31, 1985, this Court denied the motion of the counterdefendants, Robert Hammerman and Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Company, Inc., to compel arbitration of the federal securities law claims presented in the counterclaim of defendant-counterclaimant Thomas A. Peacock.1 Thereafter, on August 26, 1985, the counterdefendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases