SEABROOK v. R. H. MACY & CO., INC.


111 A.D.2d 23 (1985)

Mary F. Seabrook, Respondent, v. R. H. Macy & Co., Inc., et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 7, 1985


Plaintiff's notice does not literally satisfy the requirements of a 90-day notice pursuant to CPLR 3216. However, as Special Term noted, the rules changed, while this action was pending, to require a precalendar conference prior to serving and filing a note of issue and statement of readiness. (Rules of Sup Ct, NY & Bronx Counties, 22 NYCRR 660.35.) Here, issue was joined more than one year prior to promulgation of the rule. On the facts of this case, it was not an abuse...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases