PEARCE v. AUSTIN

No. 16785-CA.

465 So.2d 868 (1985)

C.G. PEARCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Pete AUSTIN, dba Austin Construction Company, Defendant-Appellee.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

February 27, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hayes, Harkey, Smith & Cascio by Thomas M. Hayes, III, Monroe, for plaintiff-appellant.

Grant & Dean by Philip T. Deal, Monroe, for defendant-appellee.

Before MARVIN and SEXTON, JJ., and PRICE, J. Pro Tem.


MARVIN, Judge.

In this action under the penalty wage statutes (LRS 23:631-632), Pearce, who resigned as a salesman for the defendant construction corporation, Austin, appeals that part of a judgment which rejected his demands for penalties and attorney fees on $2,948 in commissions which became due after he resigned and which were awarded Pearce in the judgment against Austin.

By answer to Pearce's appeal, Austin seeks to reverse the trial court's rejection...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases