1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 18 Ohio
  5. 18 Ohio St. 3d 115 (1985)
 

STATE EX REL. DIX v. ANGELOTTA

No. 84-950.

18 Ohio St. 3d 115 (1985)

THE STATE, EX REL. DIX, APPELLANT, v. ANGELOTTA, JUDGE, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 3, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John N. Gardner and Andrew Lee, Jr., for appellant.

John T. Corrigan, prosecuting attorney, and John B. Gibbons, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether a complaint for a writ of mandamus is the proper vehicle in which appellant's claimed speedy trial right violation should be addressed. It is axiomatic that a writ of mandamus will only be issued when the aggrieved party has no adequate remedy at law. State, ex rel. Racine, v. Dull (1975), 44 Ohio St.2d 72, 73 [73 O.O.2d 320]. Additionally...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases