1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 708 P.2d
  5. 708 P.2d 612 (1985)
 

PANNER v. DESCHUTES CTY.

85-004; CA A36841.

708 P.2d 612 (1985)

76 Or.App. 59

Owen PANNER, Joan Hale, Susan Lang, Eugene Wegner, Salley Wegner, Fred Buchanan, John Skillern, J. Glen Cougill, Douglas Muck, Frank Gilchrist, Stephen Rogers, William D. Thomason and Ann R. Thomason, Respondents, v. DESCHUTES COUNTY, Respondent (below), Rose & Associates, Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, En Banc.

Decided October 30, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert S. Lovlien, Bend, argued the cause for petitioner. On brief were Neil R. Bryant, and Gray, Fancher, Holmes & Hurley, Bend.

Ed Sullivan, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. On brief were Corinne C. Sherton, Steven L. Pfeiffer, and Sullivan, Josselson, Roberts, Johnson & Kloos, Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and WARDEN and NEWMAN, JJ.

RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of LUBA's remand of Deschutes County's decision to rezone petitioner's 20-acre aggregate resource site from surface mining reserve to an active surface mining designation. LUBA concluded that the rezoning decision did not comply with Goals 3 or 5 and that the county did not make sufficient findings under applicable provisions of its comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance. Petitioner argues in its first two assignments...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases