COLLINS v. LCDC

84-ACK-176; CA A33599.

707 P.2d 599 (1985)

75 Or.App. 517

Robertson E. COLLINS and 1000 Friends of Oregon, Petitioners, v. LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 2, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard P. Benner, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Robert E. Stacey, Portland.

Jeffrey Bennett, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before GILLETTE, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and YOUNG, JJ.


VAN HOOMISSEN, Judge.

Petitioners seek judicial review of an acknowledgment order issued by the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) declaring that the City of Jacksonville's comprehensive plan and land use regulations (Plan) are in compliance with LCDC's Statewide Planning Goals. The issues on review are whether LCDC violated ORS 197.251 and Goal 5 by acknowledging the Plan without the required identification and evaluation of conflicts over the use...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases