1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 42 Wn.
  5. 42 Wn. App. 88 (1985)
 

EASTWOOD v. CASCADE BROADCASTING

No. 6863-3-III.

42 Wn. App. 88 (1985)

708 P.2d 1216

CLYDE EASTWOOD, ET AL, Appellants, v. CASCADE BROADCASTING COMPANY, ET AL, Respondents.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.

November 5, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert F. Ewing, Jr., Huppin, Ewing, Anderson & Hergert, Blaine Gibson, and McArdle, Dohn, Talbott & Simpson, for appellants.

David A. Thorner and Thorner, Almon, Kennedy & Gano, for respondent Cascade Broadcasting.

Wiley G. Hurst and Elofson, Vincent, Hurst, Crossland, Menke & Putney, for respondent Apple Valley Broadcasting.

Alan D. Campbell and Velikanje, Moore & Shore, for respondent Columbia Empire Broadcasting.

THOMPSON, J.

The sole issue here is which statute of limitation is applicable to an action for invasion of privacy.

On June 3, 1981, three Yakima TV stations broadcast a statement that Clyde Eastwood was a coconspirator, or an unindicted coconspirator, in a federal criminal case. The statement was false. On June 1, 1984, Mr. Eastwood filed an action against the TV stations, alleging defamation, negligence, invasion of privacy, and negligent infliction of emotional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases