1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 695 P.2d
  5. 695 P.2d 574 (1985)
 

D.C. THOMPSON AND CO. v. HAUGE

C-7286; CA A32426.

695 P.2d 574 (1985)

72 Or.App. 116

D.C. THOMPSON AND COMPANY, Appellant, v. David B. HAUGE and Michele L. Hauge, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 6, 1985.

Reconsideration Denied March 22, 1985.

Review Allowed April 16, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elizabeth A. Baldwin, Astoria, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Blair J. Henningsgaard, Astoria, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Brownhill & Henningsgaard, Astoria.

Before GILLETTE, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and YOUNG, JJ.

YOUNG, Judge.

This is a forcible entry and detainer action. ORS 105.105-105.165. Plaintiff appeals from an order granting a new trial after a jury verdict for plaintiff on defendants' counterclaim. The issue, in its simplest form, is whether, after a verdict is received and the jury is discharged, the verdict may be set aside and a new trial granted because five of the six jurors say that the verdict given was not the one intended.

At the conclusion of a two...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases