MAXSON CORP. v. GARY KING CONST. CO.

No. C8-84-1633.

363 N.W.2d 901 (1985)

The MAXSON CORPORATION, Respondent, v. GARY KING CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Defendant, Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

March 12, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John G. Patterson, Moore, Costello & Hart, St. Paul, for respondent.

Mark Alexis Masica, Alan Stiegler, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Heard, considered and decided by SEDGWICK, P.J., and FOLEY and CRIPPEN, JJ.


OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Respondent Maxson seeks to recover on a surety bond issued by appellant Indemnity Insurance Company. The trial court, interpreting the meaning of "acceptance" in Minn.Stat. § 574.31 (1982), found that respondent Maxson was entitled to summary judgment. We affirm.

FACTS

On March 23, 1982, Anoka County and Gary King Construction Company ("King") entered into a contract. King agreed to furnish labor and materials...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases