1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 171 Cal.App.3d
  5. 171 Cal.App.3d 1080 (1985)
 

CAMBRIA SPRING CO. v. CITY OF PICO RIVERA

Docket No. B008660.

171 Cal.App.3d 1080 (1985)

217 Cal. Rptr. 772

CAMBRIA SPRING COMPANY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF PICO RIVERA et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

September 5, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Thomas G. Baggot for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Samuel Siegel, City Attorney, Simmons, Ritchie, Segal & Stark and Graham A. Ritchie for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

ARGUELLES, J.

Plaintiff and appellant, Cambria Spring Company (Cambria), has appealed from a judgment entered after trial before the court, sitting without a jury, in favor of defendants and respondents, the City of Pico Rivera and its redevelopment agency (Pico Rivera).

Cambria complains that it was damaged by unreasonable conduct and delays occurring after adoption on December 23, 1974, of a redevelopment plan for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases