1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 696 P.2d
  5. 696 P.2d 554 (1985)
 

1000 FRIENDS OF OREGON v. WASHINGTON COUNTY

83-ACK-216; CA A30795.

696 P.2d 554 (1985)

72 Or.App. 449

1000 FRIENDS OF OREGON, Petitioner, v. WASHINGTON COUNTY and Land Conservation and Development Commission, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 6, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert E. Stacey, Jr., Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner.

Dan R. Olsen, Asst. County Counsel, Hillsboro, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent Washington County.

Jeff Bennett, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent Land Conservation and Development Commission. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., and Michael B. Huston, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and WARDEN and NEWMAN, JJ.

RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Petitioner appeals from the Land Conservation and Development Commission's acknowledgment of Washington County's urban area comprehensive plan. Petitioner contends that the acknowledgment was inconsistent with LCDC's previously officially stated position and practice in its order acknowledging the Metropolitan Service District's regional urban growth boundary and its refusal to acknowledge the city of Hillsboro's comprehensive plan. ORS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases