LUNDGREN v. EUSTERMANN

No. C8-84-966.

370 N.W.2d 877 (1985)

Judith LUNDGREN and Gary Lundgren, husband and wife, Respondents, v. John EUSTERMANN, M.D., petitioner, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

July 12, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. Allen Dosland, William A. Moeller, New Ulm, for appellant.

David G. Moeller, Minneapolis, for respondents.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.


SIMONETT, Justice.

In this case we conclude that plaintiffs' expert, a licensed consulting psychologist, is not qualified to give opinions in a medical malpractice action on the standard of care required of the defendant medical doctor. We reverse the contrary ruling of the court of appeals.

Plaintiff-respondents Judith Lundgren and her husband, Gary, sued defendant-appellant John Eustermann, M.D., claiming Dr. Eustermann was negligent in treating Judith's...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases