LINN CARE CENTER v. CANNON

WCB No. 83-04539; CA A32964.

704 P.2d 539 (1985)

74 Or.App. 707

In the matter of the Compensation of James G. Cannon, Claimant. LINN CARE CENTER and Ebi Companies, Petitioners, v. James G. CANNON, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 7, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerald P. Keene, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners. On the brief were Craig A. Staples and Roberts, Reinisch & Klor, P.C., Portland.

Patrick L. Hadlock, Corvallis, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were S. David Eves and Ringo, Walton, Eves & Stuber, P.C., Corvallis.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.


WARREN, Judge.

The issue in this Workers' Compensation case is whether the Board correctly determined that claimant's back surgery was reasonable and necessary. On de novo review, we affirm. We write only to address the insurer's contention concerning the application and effect of a Workers' Compensation Department administrative rule.

The surgery in question was elective, and the insurer sought application of OAR 436-69-507, which provides, in part...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases