1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 777 F.2d
  5. 777 F.2d 462 (1985)
 

HADDOCK v. BOARD OF DENTAL EXAMINERS OF CAL.

No. 83-6127.

777 F.2d 462 (1985)

Sherman HADDOCK, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. BOARD OF DENTAL EXAMINERS OF CALIFORNIA, Lawrence A. Puccinelli, David W. Hamrock, Edward J. Hoefling, Knud Flygenring, Takeyasu, J. Frisch, David Maudsley, Thomas M. Stewart, Helyn C. Luechauer, Marlene Schultz, Peter Young, Jr., Paul F. Senise, Kent Madsen, Adkins, Shirley J. Bailey, Defendants/Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided November 26, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sherman Haddock, pro. per.

Stephen A. Mills, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Before ANDERSON, BEEZER, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.

J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:

This case raises the question of whether the licensing activities of the appellee Board of Dental Examiners of the State of California (hereinafter "the Board") come within the terms of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended in 1972, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (hereinafter "the Act"). The appellant, a black male, claims that the Board intentionally lowered his dental examination scores and refused to issue him...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases