GASPARINI v. HERTZ CORP.


129 Misc.2d 1102 (1985)

Lisa Gasparini, Plaintiff, v. Hertz Corporation et al., Defendants.

Civil Court of the City of New York, Special Term, New York County.

September 20, 1985


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rezak & Bloom for Hertz Corporation, defendant. Linker & Linker for plaintiff. Nathan Cyperstein for Philip C. Farley and another, defendants.


HAROLD TOMPKINS, J.

Defendant Hertz moves for summary judgment on the grounds that plaintiff's injuries are not "serious injuries" under the No-Fault Law (Insurance Law § 5104 [former § 673]), and consequently there is no right of recovery. Third-party defendant Farley cross-moves for the identical relief and adopts the arguments of defendant Hertz. For the reasons given below, the motion and cross motion are denied.

There are no reported...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases