1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 696 S.W.2d
  5. 696 S.W.2d 528 (1985)
 

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. DAVIS

696 S.W.2d 528 (1985)

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL on Behalf of the BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY OF the SUPREME COURT of Tennessee, Appellant, v. Jack H. DAVIS, et al., Appellee.

Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville.

August 26, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William W. Hunt, III, Disciplinary Counsel, Nashville, for appellant.

R. Kreis White, David Rutherford, Nashville, for appellee.

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

This is an appeal by Disciplinary Counsel from a judgment of the trial court that Appellee, Jack Davis, need not take the bar examination as a condition for reinstatement of his law license following disbarment. Disciplinary Counsel argues that Mr. Davis has not shown that he possesses the "competence and learning in law required for admission to practice law in this State... ." Rule 9, Section 19.3, Rules of the Supreme Court....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases