1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 363 N.W.2d
  5. 363 N.W.2d 842 (1985)
 

MATTILA v. MINNESOTA POWER AND LIGHT CO.

No. C8-84-1258.

363 N.W.2d 842 (1985)

Bruce D. MATTILA, Respondent, v. MINNESOTA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff, Respondent, v. NATIONAL PAINTING & SANDBLASTING, INC., Third Party Defendant, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, Plaintiff in Intervention, Appellants, v. MINNESOTA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

March 12, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry L. Munger, MacDonald, Munger & Downs, Duluth, for Bruce D. Mattila.

D. Edward Fitzgerald, Hanft, Fride, O'Brien, Harries & Bujold, Ltd., Duluth, for Minnesota Power and Light Co.

Donald C. Erickson, Johnson, Fredin, Killen, Thibodeau & Seiler, P.A., Duluth, for National Painting & Sandblasting, Inc. and Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co.

Heard, considered and decided by WOZNIAK, P.J., and PARKER and HUSPENI, JJ.

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Minnesota Power and Light Company (MP&L) and National Painting and Sandblasting, Inc. (National), entered into a contract for painting at one of MP&L's power plants. The contract contained an indemnity clause in favor of MP&L. One of National's employees was injured while working on the job, and he sued MP&L. MP&L sought indemnity from National under the contract clause.

The employee settled with MP&...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases