ALTRO v. CONRAIL


129 Misc.2d 1061 (1985)

Arthur Altro et al., Respondents, v. Conrail, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

July 15, 1985


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael J. Siris for appellant. William J. Howard, respondent pro se. Gordon Zimmerman, respondent pro se.

DiPAOLA, P. J., SLIFKIN and WIDLITZ, JJ., concur.


MEMORANDUM.

Judgments unanimously reversed, without costs, and actions dismissed.

Plaintiffs were commuters on the Harlem line of Conrail. In the summer of 1982 service on that line deteriorated to the point where, on a great number of trips, the riders were subjected to inconveniences such as no seats available, delayed trains, lack of air conditioning with the windows being sealed, filthy bathrooms and shortage of equipment. As a result, plaintiffs instituted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases