MATSON NAVIGATION CO. v. STAL-LAVAL TURBIN AB

No. C-84-0659-CAL.

609 F.Supp. 579 (1985)

MATSON NAVIGATION COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. STAL-LAVAL TURBIN AB, Asea Stal-Laval, Inc., and Asea AB, Defendants, Bremer-Vulkan Schiffbau Und Maschinenfabrik, Third-Party Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

March 21, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Stewart Harrison, Kelly C. Wooster, Brian F. Berger, Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, San Francisco, for plaintiff.

John H. Riddle, Lillick, McHose & Charles, San Francisco, Cal., Philip Le B. Douglas, Hale, Russell & Gray, New York City, for defendants.

John D. Kimball, Healy & Braillie, New York City, Eric Danoff, Graham & James, San Francisco, Cal., for third party defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER

LEGGE, District Judge.

Defendants duly moved (1) to dismiss under (a) Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and (b) the principle of forum non conveniens; (2) for summary judgment on behalf of two defendants; and (3) for sanctions on behalf of one defendant. At the hearing the motions for summary judgment were denied without prejudice, the motion for sanctions was denied and the motions to dismiss were submitted.

The court has studied the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases