ROSE v. DUCKWORTH

No. 84-1746.

769 F.2d 402 (1985)

Michael S. ROSE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jack DUCKWORTH, Superintendent, and Linley E. Pearson, Indiana Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided July 29, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark T. Dykstra, Butler, McCanna & Dykstra, Auburn, Ind., for petitioner-appellant.

William Patrick Glynn, III, Deputy Atty. Gen. of Indiana, Indianapolis, Ind., for respondents-appellees.

Before CUMMINGS, Chief Judge, CUDAHY and FLAUM, Circuit Judges.


FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

This appeal from the denial of a petition for habeas corpus involves a claim that prosecutorial misconduct in the petitioner's state trial rendered that trial fundamentally unfair. Petitioner Michael Rose was convicted of dealing in a controlled substance (LSD) after a jury trial in an Indiana state court, and his conviction was affirmed by the Supreme Court of Indiana, with one judge dissenting. Rose v. Indiana, 437 N...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases