Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Petitioners claim that the respondent candidates' designating petitions should be invalidated under Election Law §§ 16-102 and 16-116 due to alleged violations of Election Law § 2-126 involving use of party funds in a primary campaign. Petitioners' claim is without merit. It would appear from the wording of Election Law article 16 that the provisions therein were intended by the Legislature to deal...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.