1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 756 F.2d
  5. 756 F.2d 411 (1985)
 

IN RE CORRUGATED CONTAINER ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Nos. 83-2281, 83-2486.

756 F.2d 411 (1985)

In re CORRUGATED CONTAINER ANTITRUST LITIGATION. ANCHOR HOCKING, et al. and Dean Foods Company, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants Cross Appellees, v. ALTON BOX BOARD COMPANY, et al., Defendants, Container Corporation of America, et al., Defendants-Appellees Cross Appellants. ANCHOR HOCKING, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 4, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Freeman, Rothe, Freeman & Salzman, Raymond J. Mengler, Glynna W. Freeman, Jerrold E. Salzman, Chicago, Ill., for Anchor Hocking in Nos. 83-2281, 83-2486 and Armour & Co., Kraft Inc., & Wilson Foods Corp. in No. 83-2281.

McConnell, Ruberry & Jansen, Francis J. McConnell, Edward F. Ruberry, Chicago, Ill., for Dean Foods Co., Green Giant, Pillsbury, Gypsum Co., et al.

Robert J. Malinak, Richard N. Carrell, Fletcher Etheridge, Stephen D. Susman, William E. Wright, Houston, Tex., for Stone Container.

John D. Roady, Houston, Tex., for Container Corp.

Donovan, Leisure, Newton & Irvine, Eric J. Lobenfeld, Clark E. Walter, Sanford M. Litvack, New York City, for Container Corp. of America.

Richard M. Clinton, Arthur C. Claflin, Seattle, Wash., for Longview Fibre Co.

Thomas P. Hanrahan, Los Angeles, Cal., Norman J. Wiener, Portland, Or., for Williamette Industries, Corco & Western Kraft.

Mary Jo Eyster, H. Richard Wachtel, William G. Primps, New York City, Mayo J. Thompson, Houston, Tex., for St. Regis Paper Co.

Before RUBIN, POLITZ and GARWOOD, Circuit Judges.

POLITZ, Circuit Judge:

This appeal is part of the continuing sage of the corrugated container antitrust litigation. In the cases now before us the plaintiffs appeal a jury verdict absolving defendants from liability for damages for antitrust violations. Plaintiffs contend that they were entitled to a judgment non obstante veredicto or new trial and that they are entitled to injunctive relief against future violations. The defendants claim that the trial judge...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases