Petitioners seek review of the Public Employes Retirement Board's order determining that the retirement benefits provided by the City of Salem for police officers and fire fighters are equal to or better than the benefits under the Public Employes Retirement System (PERS) and that the city is therefore exempt from participating in PERS with respect to those employes. ORS 237.620(4).
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
SALEM FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 314 v. PERB
CA A30197.
702 P.2d 439 (1985)
74 Or.App. 201
The SALEM FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 314 and the Salem Police Ass'n., Petitioners, v. PUBLIC EMPLOYES RETIREMENT BOARD AND THE CITY OF SALEM, Respondents.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided July 3, 1985.
Argued and Submitted April 22, 1985.
Reconsideration Denied August 23, 1985.
Review Allowed September 17, 1985.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
William F. Nessly, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent Public Employes Retirement Board. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.
William J. Juza, City Atty., Salem, waived appearance for respondent City of Salem.
Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and WARDEN and NEWMAN, JJ.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
