ESTES v. STATE FARM FIRE & CAS. CO.

No. CX-84-1133.

365 N.W.2d 769 (1985)

Samuel E. ESTES, et al., Respondents, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

April 12, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hugh J. Cosgrove, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Robert D. Stoneburner, Paynesville, for respondents.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.


AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

The plaintiffs-petitioners Samuel E. and Jean A. Estes seek further review of a decision of the Court of Appeals reversing the trial court and concluding that a provision contained in the policy of insurance issued by the defendant State Farm Fire and Casualty Company was unambiguous. 358 N.W.2d 123. We grant the petition and modify the decision of the Court of Appeals.

It is our view that the Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases