1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 471 So.2d
  5. 471 So.2d 658 (1985)
 

SCOTT v. DURLING

No. 84-2590.

471 So.2d 658 (1985)

Mason SCOTT, Appellant, v. Mark DURLING, Ruth Kleinschmidt, Robert Macomber, George P. Brightman, William B. Kiphart, and Earl Newman, Appellees,

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 26, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jay B. Rosman of Levy, Liszewski & Rosman, Fort Myers, for appellant.

Barry R. Hillmyer of Waldorf & Kiesel, Fort Myers, for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant claims attorney's fees based upon section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1983). In following the supreme court's decision in Whitten v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co., 410 So.2d 501 (Fla. 1981), we affirm the trial court's rejection of the appellant's claim.

Although the question of whether an alleged defamation of a group of people is juridically cognizable has not been passed upon by a Florida...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases