Judgment affirmed.
Although our review of the record indicates that the prosecutor improperly elicited testimony concerning defendant's alleged possession of a controlled substance which was not charged in the indictment, we note that defendant's opening referred to the defense of entrapment. Additionally we find that there was no significant probability that the jury would have acquitted defendant had the error not occurred (cf. People v Calvano,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
