Judgment affirmed.
There was sufficient evidence to sustain defendant's conviction of arson in the second degree, as the testimony indicated that the building was damaged and that defendant knew that there were people present in the building when he started the fire. Defendant's statement to the police, given after a knowing and voluntary waiver of his rights, when viewed in conjunction with the circumstantial evidence presented by the prosecution, established beyond...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
