1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 331 S.E.2d
  5. 331 S.E.2d 769 (1985)
 

YOUNG v. YOUNG

No. 8425SC1189.

331 S.E.2d 769 (1985)

Glen YOUNG and wife Inez Young, Petitioners, v. Arthur YOUNG and wife, Irene Young, and Edna Kiser, Respondents, v. James D. YOUNG (Deceased) and wife, Parthene S. Young (Widow), and Anthony A. Bradley and wife, Sidney A. Bradley, Third Party Defendants.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 16, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mitchell, Teele, Blackwell, Mitchell & Smith by Thomas G. Smith, Valdese, for petitioner-appellants.

McMurray & McMurray by John H. McMurray, Morganton, for respondent-appellees.

ARNOLD, Judge.

The primary question presented is whether the trial judge erred in granting summary judgment for respondents on petitioners' petition to establish a boundary line.

Summary judgment is proper only if there is no genuine issue of material fact and respondents are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Vassey v. Burch, 301 N.C. 68, 72, 269 S.E.2d 137, 140 (1980).<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases