ARNOLD, Judge.
Defendant argues on appeal that the trial court erred when it admitted evidence of fingerprint identification in the absence of sufficient evidence to show that the fingerprints could only have been placed on the victim's vehicle at the time of the crime. Fingerprint evidence is admissible to corroborate the prosecuting witness's identification of defendant as the perpetrator of the charged crime. State v. Banks, 295 N.C. 399, 412,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.